Thursday, June 6, 2013

EDUC 638-Leadership in Technology, Reflective Blog 2 (Interview)

Jack and the Infostalk
             When young Jack took magic beans as payment for a cow, planted them, then climbed the stalk to see where it would lead, it was an exercise in faith.  Sometimes it takes a leap of faith – or climbing a ladder on a beanstalk – to achieve loftier goals.  Still, “69% of American high schools have banned cell phones, according to figures compiled by CommonSense Media, a nonprofit group that studies children’s use of technology” (Kessler, 2010).
               Doug Hazen, lead administrator of a K-12 special education program for River Bend Education District in Southern Minnesota, disagrees with this philosophy.  “Students should be taught to use social media effectively,” and staff communication should be “live” (D. Hazen, personal communication, June 4, 2013).  River Bend Education District doesn’t even have a common planning calendar, but with Google Docs and Gmail being brought in by the fall, he expects communication to improve.  Right now, hand-held devices are a “problem” in classrooms because students aren’t using them for educational purposes. (D. Hazen, personal communication, June 4, 2013)  Hazen believes it is time to move forward regardless of risks. 
               As for social media, the benefits of its use in classrooms are “profound,” according to Huffington Post (2011). “A year after seventh grade teacher Elizabeth Delmatoff started a pilot social media program in her Portland, Oregon classroom, 20 percent of students school-wide were completing extra assignments for no credit, grades had gone up more than 50 percent, and chronic absenteeism was reduced by more than a third” (Kessler, 2010).  It is like planting magic beans and growing a beanstalk to Heaven. Administrator Hazen thinks it is.  He says students are “more engaged in what is happening now.” (D. Hazen, personal communication, June 4, 2013) Karen Cator from the U.S. Dept. of Education believes the choice shouldn’t be about whether or not to use technology; it should be about creating more compelling activities that require students to engage in “critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration,” and “global participation” (Huffington Post, 2011).  In other words, if Jack leaves his bedroom and climbs the beanstalk, he will be exposed to other people, problems, and cultures, where he will discover a whole new learning.
               This is all very exciting, but it is also risky.  Educators are accountable for students, and leaders must accept responsibility for outcomes and align expectations with the vision for the institution. (Hall, 2008, p. 138) Where was Jack’s mother when he snuck out his bedroom window, and what about the Ogre?!  "Mostly kids at risk already have a bunch of social and emotional problems in their lives. These kids are the ones who might engage in risky behaviors, seek out sex talk online and knowingly meet people who are older” (Huffington Post, 2011).  Hazen (2013) agrees that at-risk youth will engage in risky behaviors when given the opportunity, but he advocates for teaching students how to manage information rather than protecting them from the hot oven and loud snores of predators by admonishing technological interaction altogether.  He adds, “If we could keep them as engaged educationally as they are socially…but yes, the behaviors are more risky.”
               “Don’t fight a losing battle,” says Delmatoff. “We’re going to get there anyway, so it’s better to be on the cutting edge, and be moving with the kids, rather than moving against them” (Kessler, 2010).  Doug Hazen (2013) agrees:

It reduces the number of staff needed for administration and makes special education (SPED) forms and referrals, which take a great deal of preparation, have a quicker turnaround.  Instruction is better because we are able to target multiple learning
styles and can offer chemistry, for example, through an online program.  Students at different cognitive and ability levels can be in the same environment achieving the same core goals.
Technology is a necessary part of educational administration that is here to stay. It allows River Bend to track discipline problems along with trends or gaps in achievement. This infostalk of databases and spreadsheets is critical to data-driven decision-making, the most effective way to land the golden harp.  After all, failure to access data can jeopardize budget and credibility. (Picciano, 2011, p. 53) 
               Whether integrating technology into the classroom or using it to facilitate administrative processes, school leaders should focus on the results, not the effort, and continue to “stick to the vision” (Hall, 2008, pp. 145-155).  Jack may be a candidate for a professional growth plan…if he ever grows up.  In the meantime, we could all learn a lesson about faith from him.  It probably has something to do with a mustard seed. (Luke 17:6 and Matthew 17:20)

References:
Hall, D. (2008). The technology director’s guide to leadership. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education
Huffington Post (2011, March 21). Social networking in schools: Educators debate the merits of technology in the classroom. Huff Post Education. Retrieved June 6, 2013, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/27/social-networking-schools_n_840911.html
Kessler, Sarah (2010, September 29). The case for social media in schools. Mashable. Retrieved June 6, 2013, from http://mashable.com/2010/09/29/social-media-in-school/
Picciano, A. G. (2011). Educational leadership and planning for technology (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson Education

2 comments:

  1. Dana,
    Thanks for the post and the creative title. I like an oracle approach when the titling of blogs and reflections.
    I liked the concept of using technology and teaching the ethics and morals of it. I think that is crucial. My concern with morals and ethics is whose do we teach ours, schools, or a generic tech etiquette? My first thought is that maybe it is the question asked “Where was Jack’s mom? Is this schools responsibility or the parents? There are so many issues as you pointed out that appear scary. Especially in today’s teaching world where a teacher is discarded rather than supported. Technology is great, but what is the life result of instant gratification, as technology seems to provide. That end game scares me. With more technology do we see more cyber bullying?
    I wonder if students could use portable devices connected to a secure connection for school use, with filters and protection. Perhaps as the school progresses and students show the responsibility, the filters settings could be lowered or removed. As typically occurs, someone will hack, but I wonder about the savings in a district of losing the web filters and all the resources tied with that need. Some students are probably good enough to be hacking now without being traced.
    If social media and getting connected is the ticket, why not just go to a virtual academy. Staff and students can schedule meetings, webinars, and gatherings when the students need to meet to work on projects. This reminds me of the flipped classroom concept, except for using handhelds instead.
    I think that I like the approach that Hall mentions about not liking the gadgetry but seeing technology that can actually serve a purpose or solve a problem. I am not sure if this is a magic bean or a hallucinogen. Teachers are texting jokes to each other during staff meetings and during class time.
    Just a couple of pennies worth of nonsense maybe? A real good issue to ponder.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Michael,

    Thanks for picking up on (and commenting on) the controversy surrounding tech integration. I think the biggest job is getting everyone on board with a (one) plan. It should be linked to the school's vision, and saying that, I can't help but mention that school visions are far less public than they should be. If the school is also a social system, as Hall (2008) says, communicating a mission and vision and how technology serves education will create more of a team effort rather than one person climbing into the land of mystery with hardly any way to communicate all the exciting things he's experienced when he gets back. I agree that there probably isn't a magic bean.

    I am also concerned about cyberbulling and have seen the results of lax planning and policy structure - it isn't good. It scares me that technology in schools is about what's new and not what is important to the educational process. Like you, cell phones annoy me at meetings. I take mine along when I need to wait for a message, but the phone itself is off. There are others ringing throughout the meeting and there is texting going on all over the place. This is probably something that could be addressed in Hall's text on leadership. In other words, whose job is it to draw the line between acceptable and unacceptable in that situation. If a leader doesn't do it..........???

    Talk to you next week at the final Live Meet!

    Dana

    ReplyDelete